EMP THREATS SHOULD BE DEALT WITH
Filed Wednesday, June 27. 2007
In a presentation to Congress in 1997, George W. Ullrich (deputy director of the Defense Special Weapons Agency) pointed out many issues regarding EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and HEMP (high-altitude electromagnetic pulse) weaponry.
In addition to discussing the potential damages an EMP bomb could wreak on the U.S., he stated: 0EMP protection is also affordable. If accomplished during the design phase, the cost of EMP protection is a small fraction – 1 percent to 5 percent – of overall system development costs. Done after the fact when the unprotected system has already been fielded, it can be significantly more expensive. This leads to the question of whether or not corporate assets like call centers and data centers are adequately protected against this type of threat. What about the utilities and companies providing infrastructure? Do municipalities safeguard their 911 centers or fresh water and wastewater treatment plants? Have many organizations even considered implementing any safeguards against an EMP threat? These are all questions that raise concern. Should Homeland Security Require Testing? After the dismal government response in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, you wonder how prepared all levels of government are in responding to a widespread crisis. In the case of an EMP attack, it is not a matter of who will be left standing. It is a matter of who will still have power to conduct business along with the operation of government. This includes keeping the critical electronics that control emergency services, water purification and other services up and running so society doesn’t deteriorate into roving bands of individuals scavenging for food and water. This comes from a Christian Science Monitor article: While U.S. military standards often require electronic components to be protected against an EMP, commercial standards do not. While our power grid is shielded against things such as lightning strikes, it is not tested for protection against an EMP. No Significant Launch Mechanism is Required An EMP bomb is an explosive weapon that is shot into the atmosphere and exploded 100 miles above the earth. This creates an electromagnetic pulse that fries any unprotected electronics device and/or power grid within a large geographic area. An EMP was used in the film “Ocean’s Eleven” and a “fire sale” – different from the desperate selling of a company – in the new film “Live Free or Die Hard” explores a similar outcome following a three-stage computer attack on the U.S. It does not require a sophisticated GPS guidance system or an on-board navigation system. It just needs to be shot up and exploded into the general vicinity of people. This creates an umbrella effect of chaos that could stretch miles and miles in diameter. In 2005, Joseph Farah stated: The EMP threat is not a new one considered by U.S. defense planners. The Soviet Union had experimented with the idea as a kind of super weapon against the U.S. That rapid breakdown of social order is very important to understand. It would not be too big a stretch of the imagination to envision the breakdown of society into something like in the movie “Mad Max” where people are fighting for basic necessities. That may sound very improbable to those who don’t think society would quickly break down in the event of a major disaster. For those who have their proverbial head in the sand, just look at the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Anyone thinking the local and state government is really going to protect you with a rapid response is sadly mistaken. Protection from an EMP attack should be on any mission-critical application in both the public and private sector so there is the possibility for some type of response. Carlinism: Some weapons need pinpoint accuracy to be effective. An EMP just needs to be aimed at a general vicinity to be effective. Not modified Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
No comments
The author does not allow comments to this entry
|
Powered by
Serendipity 1.2